Ideas

I want to give access to only some attributes on some elements to some users. Currently, the smallest granularity in AF Security is at the element, not attribute level. Sure there are some workarounds like creating derived templates, but it would ...

An example of the issue can be found in the 2023 Pi System Explorer help/user doc when searching for "Impact score". The text box goes past the edge of the page and you don't know if you are missing something important.

It would be useful to have documented what the differences between OS versions for the PI Data Archive in terms of performance and capabilities.

I have a question. I am adding a PI points to Attribute templates and Default values do not change. Why that is happening? Thank you

It would be helpful if AF's security model was more granular. For example (and please correct me if I am wrong), the same settings that allow someone to add/modify UOMs in AF is the same setting that allow someone to change the AF Sever name. This...

As a PI admin, I need to ensure that my data access and handling complies with classifications or levels of sensitivity. Background Regulations and compliance regimes require different controls for data based on the classification of data. Relat...